Remark. why begin with 2T? [fgap-0018]

The binary tetrahedral group \(2T\) is small enough for explicit calculations, yet it connects finite symmetry, representations, real Group Algebras, and the quaternionic structures familiar from spin mathematics. Its concrete realization by Hurwitz units, and their identification with \(2T\), are described in [voight2021quaternion, sec. 11.2, pp. 166--168], while the relation between representations and Group-Algebra modules is developed in [sengupta2010representations, secs. 3.1--3.3, pp. 39--42]. Wilson uses order-3 automorphisms of \(Q_8\) to discuss possible physical interpretations in [wilson2021finite, sec. 4.3, pp. 12--13, v5]. He later adjoins an abstract generator \(f\) of order 3 to \(Q_8\) to form \(2T\) in [wilson2021finite, sec. 6.1, p. 18, v5].

Any physical identification remains a hypothesis. A proposed correspondence must specify an action and representation, an algebra map, any preserved structure or form, a unit-group choice where applicable, and the intended physical meaning. Resemblance alone is not a model.