Example. A planar rotation as two reflections [lawson2016spin, I.2, (2.24)--(2.26), p. 18] [fcap-000Y]
✍️source

In an oriented Euclidean plane, let \(u\) and \(v\) be unit normals whose directed angle is \(\frac {\theta }{2}\). Reflection in \(u^{\perp }\) followed by reflection in \(v^{\perp }\) is rotation through \(\theta \). With the convention \(Q=-\langle -,-\rangle \), both vectors have \(Q=-1\), and \[s=\iota (v)\iota (u)\in \operatorname {Spin}(V,Q)\] lifts that rotation. In an oriented orthonormal basis \(e_1,e_2\), the familiar rotor form is \[\pm s=\cos \left (\frac {\theta }{2}\right )+\sin \left (\frac {\theta }{2}\right )\,\iota (e_1)\iota (e_2),\] after choosing the central sign and the order convention for the two reflections. This is the two-dimensional specialization of the paired lift in Theorem [fcap-000C]; the half-angle appears because the Spin element acts by conjugation on vectors.

Example. A planar rotation as two reflections [lawson2016spin, I.2, (2.24)--(2.26), p. 18] [fcap-000Y]
✍️source

Reference. Spin geometry (pms-38) [lawson2016spin]

From reflection generation to Pin and Spin [fcap-000U]

Lemma. Fixed-subspace correction by reflections [cartan1981theory, Section 10, pp. 10--12] [fcap-000V]

exists_mem_subgroup_mul_eqOn_sup_span_singleton_of_reflection_mem
L∃∀N

Proof.

Lemma. Pin-range refinement of the correction [cartan1981theory, Section 10, pp. 10--12]; [lawson2016spin, I.2, (2.26) and Theorem 2.9, pp. 18--19] [fcap-0018]

exists_mem_range_pinToOrthogonal_mul_eqOn_sup_span_singleton
L∃∀N

Theorem. Cartan--Dieudonne generation [lawson2016spin, I.2, Theorem 2.7, p. 17] [fcap-000W]

subgroup_eq_top_of_reflection_mem
L∃∀N

Proof.

Theorem. Surjectivity of the Pin action [lawson2016spin, I.2, Theorem 2.9, pp. 18--19] [fcap-000X]

pinToOrthogonal_surjective_of_isSquare pinToOrthogonal_surjective
L∃∀N

Example. A planar rotation as two reflections [lawson2016spin, I.2, (2.24)--(2.26), p. 18] [fcap-000Y]
✍️source

Lemma. Determinant parity detects the even lift [lawson2016spin, I.2, Theorems 2.7 and 2.9, pp. 17--19] [fcap-001A]

det_reflection mem_even_of_det_pinToOrthogonal_eq_one
L∃∀N

Proof.

Theorem. Surjectivity of the Spin action [lawson2016spin, I.2, Theorem 2.9, pp. 18--19] [fcap-001B]

spinToSpecialOrthogonal_surjective_of_isSquare spinToSpecialOrthogonal_surjective
L∃∀N

Lemma. The real Spin kernel is the scalar pair [gallier2014clifford, Section 1.8, Proposition 1.21, pp. 39--40] [fcap-001C]

zmodTwoMulEquivKerSpinToSpecialOrthogonal
L∃∀N

Theorem. The algebraic Spin extension [meinrenken2013clifford, Definition 3.2, pp. 51--52] [fcap-001D]

spinDoubleCoverOfSurjective spinDoubleCover
L∃∀N

Lemma. The real Pin kernel is the scalar pair [gallier2014clifford, Section 1.8, Proposition 1.21, pp. 39--40] [fcap-001E]

zmodTwoMulEquivKerPinToOrthogonal
L∃∀N

Theorem. The algebraic Pin extension [meinrenken2013clifford, Definition 3.2, pp. 51--52] [fcap-001F]

pinDoubleCoverOfSurjective pinDoubleCover
L∃∀N

Remark. Algebraic extension versus topological cover [fcap-000Z]

Theorem. Paired reflections have a product-square Spin lift [lawson2016spin, I.2, (2.24)--(2.26), p. 18] [fcap-000C]

reflection_mul_reflection_mem_range_spinToOrthogonal_of_isSquare
L∃∀N

Proof.